Effects of Ineffective Nexus Sprint Reviews
In a Nexus with multiple Scrum Teams, conducting effective Nexus Sprint Reviews is critical to maintaining high quality and fostering engagement and feedback from stakeholders.
Exam Question
Scenario A: Nexus Sprint Review with Five Scrum Teams
There are five Scrum Teams working on a Product. During the Nexus Sprint Review, the teams present the results of the Sprint. After introductions, each team takes time to present their work for inspection by individually showing the new features they have built. They are not using a shared environment. The stakeholders do not provide much feedback. The event ends and people filter out of the room.
If this pattern of Nexus Sprint Reviews continues for many Sprints, what may be the effects?
(choose the best two answers)
A. Quality will degrade as the teams delay creating a single Integrated Increment.
B. There will be more and more work to inspect so teams will need their own individual Sprint Reviews.
C. Empiricism will suffer as the teams cannot produce a shared velocity.
D. Ability to adapt will suffer as the stakeholders continue to disengage and not give feedback.
Correct Answers
A. Quality will degrade as the teams delay creating a single Integrated Increment.
D. Ability to adapt will suffer as the stakeholders continue to disengage and not give feedback.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A. Quality will degrade as the teams delay creating a single Integrated Increment:
When Scrum Teams do not work towards creating a single integrated increment by the end of the Sprint, it undermines the core principle of Scrum. Delaying the integration can lead to increased technical debt, as integration issues are not addressed promptly. This practice diminishes the overall quality of the product because problems that arise from integrating different components are discovered too late.
D. Ability to adapt will suffer as the stakeholders continue to disengage and not give feedback:
Stakeholder feedback is crucial for ensuring that the product meets the market needs and expectations. When stakeholders are disengaged and do not provide feedback, the Scrum Teams lose valuable insights that could drive product improvement. This lack of feedback hampers the ability to adapt and respond to changes, which is a fundamental principle of Scrum.
Why the Other Options Are Less Effective
B. There will be more and more work to inspect so teams will need their own individual Sprint Reviews:
While individual Sprint Reviews might seem like a solution, it contradicts the purpose of a Nexus Sprint Review, which is to inspect the integrated work of all teams. This approach does not address the core issue of integration and collaborative feedback from stakeholders.
C. Empiricism will suffer as the teams cannot produce a shared velocity:
Velocity is an internal measure for a Scrum Team and not typically shared across multiple teams. The primary focus should be on producing a single integrated increment rather than a shared velocity. The key issue here is the lack of integration and stakeholder feedback, not the shared velocity.
Benefits of Effective Nexus Sprint Reviews
- Improved Quality: Regularly integrating increments ensures that any issues are identified and resolved promptly.
- Enhanced Adaptability: Engaged stakeholders provide valuable feedback that helps teams to adapt and improve the product.
- Increased Transparency: A shared review process promotes transparency and collective understanding of the product’s progress.
- Better Collaboration: Teams working together towards a single integrated increment foster better collaboration and alignment.
Relevance to the SPS Exam
Understanding the impact of ineffective Nexus Sprint Reviews is crucial for the SPS exam. It highlights the importance of integration, stakeholder engagement, and regular feedback in maintaining product quality and adaptability.
Key Takeaways
- Regular integration and stakeholder feedback are essential for maintaining product quality and adaptability.
- Ineffective Nexus Sprint Reviews can lead to disengaged stakeholders and degraded product quality.
- The focus should be on producing a single integrated increment and fostering collaboration among teams.
Conclusion
Effective Nexus Sprint Reviews are critical for ensuring high-quality product delivery and maintaining stakeholder engagement. By focusing on integration and regular feedback, Scrum Teams can enhance their adaptability and overall product quality. For more information on preparing for the SPS exam, visit our Scaled Professional Scrum SPS™ Exam Prep.
