Answering: “The developers in your Scrum Team raise an impediment. The work planned for the upcoming Sprint involves certain knowledge and expertise they do not possess within the team. How do you handle this impediment?”

Handling Impediments Related to Knowledge Gaps in a Scrum Team

In Scrum, impediments are obstacles that slow down or block the progress of the Scrum Team. Addressing these impediments effectively is crucial for maintaining the team’s ability to deliver value consistently. When an impediment arises due to a lack of knowledge or expertise within the team, the Scrum Master plays a key role in facilitating the resolution of this challenge.

Exam Question

The developers in your Scrum Team raise an impediment. The work planned for the upcoming Sprint involves certain knowledge and expertise they do not possess within the team. How do you handle this impediment?

Explanation

Step 1: Acknowledge the Impediment

The first step in addressing this impediment is to acknowledge and clearly define the gap in knowledge or expertise. This could involve understanding exactly what skills are lacking and how they impact the ability to complete the Sprint work. Acknowledging the impediment openly with the team ensures transparency and sets the stage for collaborative problem-solving.

Step 2: Explore Internal Resources

  • Identify Team Members with Relevant Experience:
    Action: Look within the organization to identify if there are any other teams or individuals who possess the required knowledge or expertise. You might find that someone within the broader organization can offer mentorship or guidance.
    Benefit: Leveraging internal resources can quickly bridge the knowledge gap and help the team move forward without significant delays.
  • Encourage Peer Learning:
    Action: Facilitate a learning session where team members can share their knowledge and expertise. This could involve pairing more experienced developers with those who need to develop new skills.
    Benefit: This approach not only addresses the immediate impediment but also builds the team’s overall skill set, making them more resilient in the future.

Step 3: Consider External Help

  • Bring in External Expertise:
    Action: If the necessary expertise is not available within the organization, consider bringing in an external consultant or expert on a temporary basis. This could be a short-term engagement focused on upskilling the team or completing the specific task at hand.
    Benefit: Bringing in external help can provide the specialized knowledge required to overcome the impediment quickly, ensuring the Sprint remains on track.
  • Invest in Training and Development:
    Action: If the gap in expertise is likely to be a recurring issue, consider investing in formal training or professional development for the team members. This could involve sending developers to relevant workshops, courses, or certifications.
    Benefit: While this approach may not solve the immediate issue within the current Sprint, it ensures that the team is better equipped to handle similar challenges in the future, reducing dependency on external help.

Step 4: Adjust the Sprint Plan

  • Reassess the Sprint Backlog:
    Action: If the knowledge gap cannot be bridged quickly enough, work with the Product Owner and the team to reassess the Sprint Backlog. Identify whether there are alternative Product Backlog items that can be worked on within the current Sprint, allowing the team to continue delivering value without being blocked.
    Benefit: This ensures that the team remains productive, even if the original plan needs to be adjusted due to unforeseen challenges.
  • Postpone the Affected Work:
    Action: If the critical work cannot be completed due to the lack of expertise, it may be necessary to postpone it to a future Sprint. The team should document this decision, ensure it is communicated transparently to stakeholders, and include it in the Retrospective for future planning.
    Benefit: By postponing the work, the team can focus on areas where they are confident and capable, avoiding unnecessary delays and frustration.

Step 5: Reflect in the Retrospective

  • Discuss the Impediment:
    Action: During the Sprint Retrospective, discuss the knowledge gap as an impediment. Explore what could have been done differently and how the team can better prepare for similar situations in the future.
    Benefit: This reflection helps the team to continuously improve their processes and strategies for dealing with knowledge gaps and other impediments. It also fosters a culture of continuous learning and adaptation.
  • Update the Definition of Done:
    Action: Consider whether the Definition of Done needs to be updated to include criteria that ensure the team has the necessary skills and knowledge before committing to work in future Sprints.
    Benefit: By updating the Definition of Done, the team can prevent similar issues from arising in the future, ensuring that all work committed to in a Sprint is feasible and within the team’s capabilities.

Relevance to the PSM III Exam

In the PSM III exam, understanding how to handle impediments, especially those related to knowledge gaps, is crucial. A Scrum Master must demonstrate the ability to facilitate solutions that keep the team moving forward while maintaining a focus on continuous improvement. This scenario tests your ability to manage real-world challenges in a way that aligns with Scrum principles and practices.

Key Takeaways

  • Transparency: Acknowledge and clearly define the knowledge gap as an impediment to ensure it is addressed openly and collaboratively.
  • Collaboration: Leverage internal resources and encourage peer learning to bridge knowledge gaps without delaying the Sprint.
  • Adaptation: Be flexible in adjusting the Sprint plan if necessary, and ensure that decisions are documented and communicated transparently.
  • Continuous Improvement: Reflect on the impediment during the Retrospective and update the Definition of Done to prevent similar issues in the future.

Conclusion

Handling knowledge gaps within a Scrum Team requires a proactive and collaborative approach. By acknowledging the impediment, leveraging internal and external resources, and being flexible in adapting the Sprint plan, the Scrum Master can help the team overcome challenges and continue delivering value. For more insights into handling impediments and preparing for the PSM III exam, visit our Scrum Master PSM IIIâ„¢ Exam Prep.

Table of Contents

Sign up for more exam tips and discounts



How To Pass PSM III Exam on the First Try
ScrumPrep

PSM III Exam Guide

The Professional Scrum Master III (PSM III) exam is a challenging assessment that requires a deep understanding of the Scrum framework and its application in real-world scenarios. In this article, we will discuss some tips and strategies that can help you pass the PSM III exam on your first attempt. Table of Contents Understanding the PSM III Exam Before diving into the tips and strategies, it’s important to understand the PSM III exam’s structure and format. The PSM III exam is an open-book, essay and multiple-choice assessment that tests your ability to apply the Scrum framework in complex situations. The exam consists of 24 essay questions, and you have 150 minutes to complete it. Scoring and Passing Unlike the multiple

Read More »

Related Products

LIMITED TIME SALE!
PSM III Practice Tests - ScrumPrep
Become a Scrum expert! Master Scrum application, practices, and values to tackle complex team and organizational situations and pass the PSM III exam.
  • 68+ PSM IIIâ„¢ exam sample questions
  • Multi-level essay questions (multiple questions asked in a single ‘essay question’)
  • Sample essay answers and explanations
  • Bonus – Core Concepts Enhancement: Expert Level Multiple-Choice Practice
  • Questions developed by experienced Scrum exam experts
  • Updated to the current PSM IIIâ„¢ 2024 exam

You cannot copy content of this page

$35 Exam Preps

Sale Ending Soon

Day
Hour
Min
Sec
Offer Expired
Add Your Heading Text Here